"SELF DETERMINATION IS KEY TO THE WORLD PEACE"
WikiLeaks: Chief Justice Shirani Bandaranayake is a Rajapkasa loyalist
[Tuesday, 1 November 2011 21:48] Featured, General, Human Rights Articles, News-
Who Made Thee a Ruler and a Judge Over Us?
Posted by Sarath Silva | October 31, 2011, 12:58 am
Reply to this comment
-
Even now we don’t take decision about our judiciary, all right thinking people will face trouble
Posted by D.M.Thushara Jayarathna | October 31, 2011, 1:15 am
Reply to this comment
-
Dr B is a SLFPer and , always had political appointments from SLFP regime.
Posted by Sam_Subasinghe | October 31, 2011, 7:05 am
In journalism truth is a process
⋅ October 31, 2011 ⋅ 23 Comments
Filed Under Anti Corruption, Democracy, Authoritarianism, FOREIGN AFFAIRS, US embassy cables on Sri Lanka, Sri Lankans in WikiLeaks, Corruption in Sri Lankan Judicary, Sri Lankan judicial system, Chief Justice Shirani Bandaranayake, General Fonseka, SRI Lankan Kleptocracy
By Colombo Telegraph -
The President made a show of appointing her in place of Chief Justice Asoka de Silva, who was thought to be more sympathetic to the case
“The court was presided over by Acting Chief Justice Shirani Bandaranayake, considered a Rajapkasa loyalist. Several days ago, the president made a show of appointing her in place of Chief Justice Asoka de Silva, who was thought to be more sympathetic to the case but is traveling abroad.” the US Ambassador to Colombo wrote to Washington.
A leaked US diplomatic cable records the Supreme Court decision on General Fonseka’s Fundamental Rights petition re his unlawful detention. The Colombo Telegraph found the cable from WikiLeaks database. The cable written on February 24, 2010 and classified as “CONFIDENTIAL” by the Deputy Chief of Mission Valerie Fowler.
The US Ambassador to Colombo Patricia A. Butenis wrote “On February 23, the Sri Lankan Supreme Court denied former presidential candidate General Fonseka’s petition for release as interim relief in his fundamental rights case challenging the legality of his detention. The court ruled that because the basis of the submission for interim relief was ‘linked’ to the final relief requested, the court was ‘not in a position’ to grant the interim relief.”
There was no reason to detain him
“The court adopted the Attorney General’s argument that Fonseka’s claim that there was no reason to detain him could be verified until the investigation had been completed. While no charges have been filed against Fonseka, areas of investigation mentioned by the Attorney General included the alleged 400 army ‘deserters’ at the hotel with Fonseka during election day, Fonseka’s statement that he would release ‘top secret’ information on the final stages of the war, and the Hi-Corp military procurement corruption case involving his son-in-law.” ambassador Butenis further wrote.
Several senior human rights lawyers practicing in Colombo have told the Colombo Telegraph that Chief Justice Bandaranayake cannot be regarded as impartial and independent in cases involving sensitive political issues, particularly those that have a connection to the Rajapaksas. Dr. Shirani Bandaranayake’s direct elevation to the Supreme Court from the Faculty of Law at Colombo University during the Kumaratunga administration was itself a political appointment, in which her mentor at the Law Faculty, the then Justice Minister, and present Foreign Minister G.L. Peiris played a key role. Following her husband’s acceptance of a political appointment from the Rajapaksa regime, however, any semblance of independence that remained has completely disappeared. From the US Embassy cable below, which deals with the fundamental rights application of Sarath Fonseka challenging his detention following the presidential election in January 2010, it would seem that Ambassador Butenis also did not believe in the judicial independence of Justice Shirani Bandaranayake.
To read more about Sri Lankan Judiciary click here
Below we give a part of the confidential cable.
VZCZCXRO1439OO RUEHAG RUEHROV RUEHSL RUEHSRDE RUEHLM #0132/01 0550154ZNY CCCCC ZZHO 240154Z FEB 10FM AMEMBASSY COLOMBOTO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 1354INFO RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE PRIORITYRUEHKA/AMEMBASSY DHAKA PRIORITY 2443RUEHIL/AMEMBASSY ISLAMABAD PRIORITY 9460RUEHKT/AMEMBASSY KATHMANDU PRIORITY 7715RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 5453RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI PRIORITY 3882RUEHNY/AMEMBASSY OSLO PRIORITY 0039RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA PRIORITY 0239RUEHSM/AMEMBASSY STOCKHOLM PRIORITY 0855RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY 4502RUEHCG/AMCONSUL CHENNAI PRIORITY 0021RUEHBI/AMCONSUL MUMBAI PRIORITY 7255RUEHON/AMCONSUL TORONTO PRIORITY 0234RHEFDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC PRIORITYRUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA PRIORITY 0146RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI PRIORITYRUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS PRIORITYRHEHAAA/NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WASHINGTON DC PRIORITYRUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITYC O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 COLOMBO 000132 SIPDIS DEPARTMENT FOR SCA/INSB E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/23/2019TAGS: PGOV PREL PREF PHUM PTER EAID MOPS CESUBJECT: FONSEKA CATCH-22: SUPREME COURT RULES NO RELEASEWITHOUT CHARGES COLOMBO 00000132 001.2 OF 002 Classified By: DEPUTY CHIEF OF MISSION VALERIE C. FOWLER. REASONS: 1.4 (B, D) ¶1. (C) SUMMARY: At a Fundamental Rights hearing on February23, the Supreme Court denied General Fonseka release asinterim relief because his claim that there was no reason todetain him could not be verified until the investigation wascompleted and, presumably, charges were filed. At the same time, however, the court authorized protection of Fonseka’ssecurity, greater access by his family, access by hisattorneys, and possibly access by his physicians. The nexthearing was scheduled for April 26, 2010. Embassy PolOff attended the hearing. END SUMMARY. RELIEF DENIED————- ¶2. (SBU) On February 23, the Sri Lankan Supreme Court deniedformer presidential candidate General Fonseka’s petition forrelease as interim relief in his fundamental rights casechallenging the legality of his detention. The court ruledthat because the basis of the submission for interim reliefwas "linked" to the final relief requested, the court was"not in a position" to grant the interim relief. (NOTE: Thecourt was presided over by Acting Chief Justice ShiraniBandaranyake, considered a Rajapaksa loyalist. Several daysago, the president made a show of appointing her in place ofChief Justice Asoka de Silva, who was thought to be moresympathetic to the case but is traveling abroad. END NOTE.)Fonseka was not present at the hearing and his attorney had not had access to him. The next hearing was set for April26, 2010, after the parliamentary elections. ¶3. (SBU) The court adopted the Attorney General’s argumentthat Fonseka’s claim that there was no reason to detain himcould not be verified until the investigation had beencompleted. While no charges have been filed against Fonseka,areas of investigation mentioned by the Attorney Generalincluded the alleged 400 army "deserters" at the hotel withFonseka during election day, Fonseka’s statement that hewould release "top secret" information on the final stages ofthe war, and the Hi-Corp military procurement corruption caseinvolving his son-in-law.BUTENIS
« Namal Rajapaksa’s law exam cheating case goes to Geneva
Parithy – Head of LTTE’s Nediyavan unit in France was attacked »
Discussion
23 Responses to “WikiLeaks: Chief Justice Shirani Bandaranayake is a Rajapkasa loyalist”
-
-
Hell, if it happens in the US then it must be all OK!
Posted by Sarath | October 31, 2011, 5:37 pm
Quite right bro, Even in the US its the same…And we SriLankans think its ONLY happening in SL irrespective of what party/Gov is in power
Posted by sonna boy from Kandy NOT from Matara | October 31, 2011, 2:09 pm
Reply to this comment
-
-
when justice dies in a society
everything else is cremated
from DSS to PMR all SL leaders in different degrees, dismantled the justice system for their own interest
so where there is no rule of law only animals can roam
Posted by S R – UK | October 31, 2011, 2:02 pm
Reply to this comment
-
The day she was appointed to supreme court from back door and asked her to keep this corrupted system and politically motivated legal system salves to them ,she is suitable to be chief justice. look the sevenagala sugar corporation case.it is shame to say that when supreme court delivered basically wrong judgment in law. and , factually wrong in entire judgment,JUST to bail out wrong doing political leaders and loss billion to public and white washed by supreme court who were responsible for such matter .she was even unable to understand different between legal right for concluded contract and legitimate expectation for finalized deal.it was first politically motivated judgment by her.if some one sited same wrong case for future reference in her court room TODAY does she ready to accept that ? or she has to tell them that is only for government special.I would like to invite legal community to read this wrong judgment(1998-FR264) written by her to understand her capability or how she delivered 100%WRONG such judgments.what to do this is the actual and true position of the country.I am asking from her today can you accepted that wrong judgment by yourself after having over 17 year experiencing heavy cost to the public????????????????? but you will never have answer for this question in your entire legal carrier but it was wrong and shameful and BLACK MARK.
Posted by laksiri | October 31, 2011, 2:13 pm
Reply to this comment
-
The husband of the Chief Justice is a political stooge of the President, holding a political appointment. The only hope Sri Lankan’s had, Justice system too is no more. There is no rule of the law, the police too are puppets of the Politicians, innocent civilians have no where to go. Unless the International Community put pressure on the corrupt family regime, the consequences will be really dangerous.
Posted by B.Fernando | October 31, 2011, 2:55 pm
Reply to this comment
-
-
Hey man, stop calling us idots (sic). We voted for Rajapaksa because we got a Buriyani and a blue and white cap from him (those who got a T-shirt also voted twice but not me). What did you get? Who is idiotic now?
Roads are being built throughout the island. OK, I can’t afford to buy fuel anymore but I’m going to ride my bicycle in the Southern Expressway very soon.
How brilliant is Mahinda Chinthanaya? It is his idea, that through “Api Wawamu Rata Nagamu”, we should grow our own food so we don’t even have to go to the shop to buy stuff. What other leader thought of asking people to make their own damn food? OK, now the thing is called something else but if we didn’t vote for him we would have never known about this concept of growing our own food, now would we?
Look how much money he earned by selling land to foreign companies. Next he is going to introduce a new law and take back all those land sold to private companies. You’ve got to hand it to him, don’t you think?
Posted by sunil | October 31, 2011, 6:15 pm
Reply to this comment
all true bro..But still Sri Lankans idots woreship this stupid regem and vote for them,What we need id big sunami come and wash the whole country and start from Amiba.No one can change our attitude Country second bath gotta first.
Posted by Wasantha | October 31, 2011, 3:18 pm
Reply to this comment
-
-
Judges Are for Sale — and Special Interests Are Buying
By ADAM COHEN | Time.com –
The Occupy Wall Street movement is shining a spotlight on how much influence big-money interests have with the White House and Congress. But people are not talking about how big money is also increasingly getting its way with the courts, which is too bad. It’s a scandal that needs more attention. A blistering new report details how big business and corporate lobbyists are pouring money into state judicial elections across the country and packing the courts with judges who put special interests ahead of the public interest.
A case in point: West Virginia. In 2007, the West Virginia Supreme Court, on a 3-2 vote, threw out a $50 million damage award against the owner of a coal company. Funny thing: the man who would have had to pay the $50 million had spent $3 million to help elect the justice who cast the deciding vote. The West Virginia ruling was so outrageous that in 2009 the United States Supreme Court overturned it. But that was unusual. In most cases, judges are free to decide cases involving individuals and groups that have paid big money to get them elected. (MORE: Justice on Display: Should Judges Deliberate in Public?)
So who is paying? The new study — by New York University Law School’s Brennan Center for Justice, the National Institute on Money in State Politics, and the Justice at Stake Campaign, a non-partisan reform group — found that a small group of super spenders plays the biggest role, using their money to buy the kind of judges they want hearing their cases. These super spenders are the usual suspects: mainly big business, corporate lobbyists, and trial lawyers. Also high on the list: a disturbing category called “unknown.” In many states, disclosure laws are so weak that special interests can buy judicial elections without the public even finding out.
There is also a lot of one-issue money sloshing around. In 2010, three Iowa Supreme Court justices who ruled in favor of gay marriage were voted out of office — after a bitterly fought campaign dominated by money from out-of-state groups like the National Organization for Marriage and the American Family Association. Much of the special interest money is used for attack ads, which leverage hot-button issues to demonize judicial candidates. Has a sitting judge ever reversed a criminal conviction because the law was not followed? Then they must be soft on crime — and not care about victims.
Why does all this matter? Because as money floods into judicial elections, we are getting courts that are filled with judges whose first loyalty is not to justice — or to the general public — but to insurance companies, big business and other special interests. It’s not hard to guess what insurance companies want their judges to do. They want them to rule against people who have been injured — even when they deserve compensation, and they want damage awards to be slashed. Big business wants weak enforcement of laws against discrimination and pollution. On the other side of the political spectrum, trial lawyers want verdicts for plaintiffs — and large damage awards.
The report’s authors have some suggestions for minimizing the impact of payola. They want to see more public financing of judicial campaigns, although it is unclear how much the current United States Supreme Court will allow. (The conservative majority has been recklessly striking down campaign finance rules in recent years.) Many reformers think that the answer lies in ending the direct election of judges, and switching to a system (which some states already have) of appointing judges. That takes away the problem of elections, but special interests can shift their strategy to lobbying governors to appoint sympathetic judges. (MORE: John Paul Stevens Publishes Supreme Court Memoir)
Clearly, this is not a problem with easy solutions. But there need to be solutions. The American ideal of justice requires neutral judges, whose only commitment is to the law. Judicial elections that are dominated by special interest money make a mockery of that ideal.
Cohen, the author of Nothing to Fear, teaches at Yale Law School
Posted by sonna boy from Kandy NOT from Matara | October 31, 2011, 3:46 pm
Reply to this comment
-
NOT ME,,PLz HELP THE POO
Posted by Kalyana | October 31, 2011, 4:07 pm
Reply to this comment
-
WHAT GOES AROUND , WILL FOLLOW U NO MATTER WHAT… IT IS HAPPENNING TU ALL, ATROCITIES , TU ALL NATIONS,,, PEOPLE ARE UPRISING, AGAINST COWARDNESS,OF IMMORTALITY,THE TRUTH,WHAT IS NOT WHAT,,, THE JUSTICE OF ALL HUMANS , SHOULD HAVE AN, EQUAL SHARE OF FREEDOM, NT BASED UPON YR RELIGION, COLOUR, GENDER PR THE RELIGIUON
Posted by DS | October 31, 2011, 4:08 pm
Reply to this comment
-
Sad to see the greatest General in Sri Lankan history wearing prisoners suit.
Posted by Malcolm – Negombo | October 31, 2011, 4:09 pm
Reply to this comment
-
Dear sir,your the best Commander in SLA,,,,,,,,,,,,,(As per ur plan we did it)
Posted by Ravinath | October 31, 2011, 4:09 pm
Reply to this comment
-
The man is purported to have made a statement putting Sri Lanka in a very embarrasing position world wide. He said what he said and that appeared in the Sunday Leader. He did not deny that then and Fredrika Jansz went on and gave evidence in Court that he did say that the Defence Secretary made the statement to an Army Officer who was in the presence of a journalist. Neither Jansz nor Fonseka heard the statement being made and cannot vouch for the veracity. In law this is an illegal statement called “hearsay”. But the world media did not see it like that and with the help of the Sunday Leader and the LTTE fronts all over the world Sri Lanka is now a country of war criminals. One because one man had not got the brains to keep his mouth shut and the other a frustrated woman scorned by all her ex lovers who had no brains to see that she had no right to carry the story. She is vindictive and I hope earnestly that Sarath Fonseka will be liberated and that Fredrika Jansz will be sentenced to 10 years for spreading false rumours that brough disrepute to our country.
Posted by Peter Casie Chetty | October 31, 2011, 5:00 pm
Reply to this comment
-
I don’t get these people…
The rule says the President will appoint the Chief Justice. All you guys are up in arms because he appointed a loyalist? Isn’t it a bit too late for this outrage? Shouldn’t you have been upset when the made the rule?
Posted by Sarath | October 31, 2011, 5:48 pm
Reply to this comment
-
All Presidents would like to appoint their loyalists. The rule is by way of seniority. Who upset the applecart first? Kumaratunge, by appointing that madman Sarath Silva and pushing aside one of our best judges, MDH Fernando. After that, the rest was all downhill. These jokers, Asoka de Silva and Bandaranayake included do not have a basic capacity to be a judge, let alone a Chief Justice.
The point is that when you are appointed to the post, you are supposed to act independently. not kowtow to politicians. Sri Lankan judges have forgotten that. The time will come when, like mobs attacking police stations which is common ow in Sri Lanka, they will also attack and stone judges
Pandukabaya
Posted by Pandukabaya de Silva | October 31, 2011, 7:51 pm
Reply to this comment
-
Why America president and congress only appoint chefe justist? Any other country should have to do American advise. This is all American shit, they want’s to dominate world, we SriLankan fortunate there are some other world dominate country like China, Russia and such as India as our freiends, Otherwise America will get all other counties as their slaves. Mhinda Rajapaksa did as what America did. Writer should have to mind your own buisness please.
Posted by Don Martin | October 31, 2011, 9:53 pm
Reply to this comment
-
Guys Do not bark…JR started all these, got thugs to stone the Supreme Court judges houses…were you all sleeping at the time?????????
Posted by Nihal M…. | November 1, 2011, 3:04 pm
Reply to this comment
-
Guest
Trackbacks/Pingback
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
Email (required) (Not published)
Name (required)
Website
Please log in to WordPress.com to post a comment to your blog.
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change
- Entries (RSS)
About us
Global Peace Support Group UK Ltd is a registered organisation based in London. The organisation dedicated to be involved in humanitarian and other related issues. We also work along with other similar organisations to promote peace and harmony among various societies..
GLOBAL PEACE SUPPORT GROUP - UK - TIRELESSLY WORK ON THE CONCEPT OF:
"SELF DETERMINATION IS KEY TO THE WORLD PEACE"
MOURNS ON THE CONTINUED TRAGEDY OF THE PEOPLE OF North & East of Tamil EELAM WITH THE HOPE OF ALL OF OUR ENDEAVOURS WOULD BRING AN END TO THOSE SUFFERING DURING THE YEAR AHEAD.
The International community has a duty towards the long suffering Sri Lankan Tamil population to restore their rights of SELF DETERMINATION.
Global Peace Support Group - believes that this is the ONLY way for a permanent PEACE in Sri Lanka.
Featured
Tamil Aricles
Latest from Tamil News Network (TNN)
- Sri Lanka sets up new courts to try war suspects May 24, 2012Sri Lanka is setting up new courts to accelerate cases against hundreds of Tamil rebel suspects three years after the end of the island’s bloody ethnic war, a government spokesman said Thursday. Lakshman Yapa Abeywardena said the justice ministry would open three courts near the former war zone in the northeast of Sri Lanka to hear charges against more than […]
- Slaying of Tamil-Canadian underscores enduring ethnic violence in Sri Lanka May 24, 2012Andrew Mahendrarajah Antonipillai believed he was protected. Family and friends tried to warn him of the danger he faced returning to his native Sri Lanka. But Mr. Antonipillai, a man his Montreal neighbours knew as ready to help anyone in need, shrugged them off, saying his Canadian citizenship would keep him safe. “They can’t do anything to me,” he told fr […]
- Reconciliation: The Symbolic and the Substantive May 24, 2012Photo courtesy JDS Against the backdrop of grave planetary changes, Sarath Fonseka’s release, G.L. Peiris’s visit to Washington DC and the third anniversary of the defeat of the LTTE, an evaluation of the requirements of reconciliation are in order. There is a need to distinguish between the symbolic and the substantive – both in turn playing their part in […]
- India’s Marxist Communist Party calls for withdrawal of Sri Lanka military May 24, 2012The Marxist Communist Party of India (CPI-M) in a press release on Wednesday called for immediate withdrawal of the Sri Lanka military stationed in Tamil areas of the island. In one of the five resolutions passed at the state committee meeting of the party held at Ealakiri in Tamil Nadu last Sunday, it was decided to urge the Indian government to diplomatica […]
- Tamils will never accept Sri Lanka constitution: Sivajilingam May 24, 2012Eezham Tamils were not a party and will never accept the one-sided constitutions Sri Lanka enacted either in 1972 or in 1978, said former TNA parliamentarian MK Sivajilingam speaking in Jaffna on the 40th anniversary of the 1972 republican constitution of Sri Lanka on Tuesday. The 1978 constitution not only continued the unitary concept but also made it more […]
- 1972 constitution reminds Tamils not to backtrack idea of nationhood May 24, 2012The 1972 republican constitution of Sri Lanka, which for the first time constitutionalised a unitary Sinhala-Buddhist state, was enacted without the participation or mandate of Eezham Tamils. Not only their political opposition was brushed aside but even the judiciary also played a game against legal challenges. The constitution forced the shift in Tamil pol […]
- Out of jail, Sri Lankan ex-general says government must go May 23, 2012He was pardoned by the president and released from jail, but Sri Lankan former army chief Sarath Fonseka had nothing but scorn for the government on his first day of freedom and vowed to fight for its downfall. The ex-general said it could take 5 to 10 years to change the political culture of the island nation but he was determined to join forces with opposi […]
- 40-year-old Sri Lanka constitution burnt at cremation ground of Parvathi Amma May 23, 2012The 1972 republican constitution of Sri Lanka, which for the first time constitutionalised the unitary Sinhala-Buddhist State and brought in the name ‘Sri Lanka’, against the wishes of the nation of Eezham Tamils in the island, has been burnt on its 40th anniversary on Tuesday, 22 May 2012, at the spot where the LTTE leader Pirapharan’s mother was cremated b […]
- Remembering Mu’l’livaaykkaal is for edification of international community May 23, 2012Remembering Mu’l’livaaykkaal is not wailing for a tragedy. It is remembering the highest achievement of modern Tamil history, when Tamils decisively said no to an entire international community abetting a genocidal state. Mu’l’livaaykkaal is not an end of a journey. It calls for our massive re-commitment of collective political aspirations more than ever, as […]
- Release Tamil political prisoners-TNA May 22, 2012The Tamil National Alliance (TNA) today renewed its request for the release all ‘Tamil political prisoners’. Making a statement in parliament under Standing Orders 23-II, TNA leader R. Sampanthan said as many as 234 Tamil prisoners had been on a hunger strike for six consecutive days and their health condition had deteriorated. Mr. Sampanthan said the govern […]