| Jul 04, 2011

sri lanka: war atrocities

Who, Us, What?

A documentary collates the horrors from the final war against the LTTE

Satarupa Bhattacharjya

Video grabs from Channel 4’s documentary ‘Sri Lanka’s Killing Fields’. Shown here are images of blindfolded LTTE men being shot dead in cold blood by, presumably, Lankan soldiers.

Text Size  

COMMENTS

“Are you still afraid to kill a terrorist?” asks a man, most likely a soldier, in Sinhala to the one standing next to him, with his gun pointed at three blindfolded people, their hands bound, naked and kneeling on the ground. Gunshots are heard, the three prisoners flop to the ground, their heads drenched in blood. Gruesome images emerge in quick succession—naked and possibly sexually abused dead women being dumped into a trunk, heaps of dead bodies of child soldiers of the LTTE, streams of blood flowing out of hospitals located in no-fire zones which the Sri Lankan government forces allegedly shelled, repeatedly and deliberately, killing countless civilians. To this carnage the LTTE too contributed, its suicide bombers detonating amidst civilian crowds or maniacally shooting at people trying to escape its control.

These are some of the horrific images from the Channel 4 documentary, Sri Lanka’s Killing Fields, which depicts the relentless bloodbath in the final months of war between the LTTE and the government in 2009 that claimed, third-party figures suggest, around 40,000 lives. It took Channel 4 two years to source these grotesque images, apparently caught on mobile phones and small cameras by victims and perpetrators (as war trophies). Not only does the film echo incidents mentioned in a UN panel report released two months ago, it also appears to belie the post-war statement of Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa, “Soldiers carried guns in one hand and the human rights charter in the other.”

In Sri Lanka, though, the veracity of the documentary has been challenged. Asked whether he found the visuals shocking, Sri Lankan army spokesperson Maj Gen Ubhaya Medawala told Outlook, “What is shocking is that Channel 4 fabricated such a story. It was designed to tarnish the country’s image and that of its armed forces.” At a press conference last week, external affairs minister G.L. Pieris said, “The Channel 4 video footage on Sri Lanka is a part of a vicious, politically motivated campaign against the country.” These views have the endorsement of the average Sinhalese on the road, from trishaw drivers to workers at departmental stores to young professionals. They feel that western governments are “victimising” Colombo and, more importantly, that reopening old wounds would only hurt the process of reconciliation.

But for many Tamilians, the walk down the road to reconciliation must include justice for those who allegedly suffered state brutality. Rajan Hoole, a founder member of the University Teachers for Human Rights (Jaffna), feels the Channel 4 film is “partly the consequence of the government keeping international observers away…to fight a war without witnesses, and then failing to respond to the worldwide concerns for the civilians during and after the war and adopting a course of total denial.”

When it was shown at the UNHRC in Geneva, viewers cringed, one cried openly seeing the inhuman images.

Colombo’s concerted attempts to bar independent observers has been borne out by former UN spokesperson in Sri Lanka Gordon Weiss’s comments in the film. He accused Colombo of “intending to remove independent witnesses” from the north as fighting peaked between 2008-end and early ’09. The UN was asked to get out of the war zone by the Rajapaksa government which said it could not guarantee the safety of its staffers. In his book out now, The Cage, Weiss writes, “…I believe that the tactical choices the Sri Lankan army was directed to make, and which contributed to the deaths of so many civilians, warrant a credible judicial investigation of the kind that the Sri Lankan state, in its current guise, is no longer capable of mounting.” About the film, former foreign ministers of UK and France, David Miliband and Bernard Kouchner, recently wrote, “If foreign policy is about anything, it should be about stopping this kind of inhumanity.”

Sri Lankan ministers and media commentators here are quick to counter such opinions: what about Libya where NATO’s air-raids are even killing children? Have you forgotten Iraq and Afghanistan? Young Facebook users, born well after the civil war began, talk about the West’s “hypocrisy” in status messages. This isn’t to suggest that there is no dissenting voice from the Lankan political class. Former foreign minister and opposition parliamentarian Mangala Samaraweera told Outlook, “The government’s denial of human rights violations may lead to its further isolation in the international community…in defence of sovereignty, nobody has the right to ill-treat its own citizens.”

The documentary, available on YouTube, has outraged the ever expanding circle of critics abroad. When it was screened at the United Nations Human Rights Council, Geneva, in the first week of June, some viewers cringed; one cried openly. The British House of Commons even debated whether the visuals could be considered as evidence of war crimes. Last year, talk about rights violations prompted the European Union to suspend its trade concessions to Sri Lanka.

But the government remains seemingly unperturbed. A fortnight ago, the Sri Lankan army had organised an anti-terror international seminar in Colombo, touting its model of counterinsurgency and winning encomiums from many participants. And on the sidelines of last week’s 15th St Petersburg International Economic Forum, Rajapaksa was assured of support from Dmitry Medvedev and Hu Jintao, his Russian and Chinese counterparts. With Chinese investments in major infrastructure projects here growing and now with Russia’s GAZPROM ready to explore oil and gas off the island’s Mannar coast, a new axis is on the move.

The growing Chinese influence has further weakened the Indian approach which, many here contend, was anyway weak on multilateralism in Sri Lanka. Says Dr Hoole, “When India places the onus on bilateral relations, the human and political rights of the Tamils tend to become hostage to Sino-Indian rivalry, as appears the case now.” Tamil National Alliance parliamentarian Suresh Premachandran feels that India’s foreign policy in Sri Lanka has failed, pointing out how New Delhi has been unable to get a devolution package for the north and east. He adds, “India had satellite images of the war…its government knew how many people were killed. India must decide whether it wants to isolate itself from the Sri Lankan Tamils.” With the government change in Tamil Nadu and AIADMK leader Jayalalitha’s negligible influence over the UPA, it scarcely matters that the state assembly recently passed a resolution asking New Delhi to impose economic sanctions on Colombo.

Even pro-government Tamil politician Dharmalingam Siddarthan says human rights issues, if left unattended, would further widen the gap between the Sinhalese and the Tamils. Despite the civil war ending in 2009, the island remains a nation at war with itself.

COMMENTS

Authors:  Satarupa Bhattacharea

Select LanguageAfrikaansAlbanianArabicBelarusianBulgarianCatalanChinese (Simplified)Chinese (Traditional)CroatianCzechDanishDutchEstonianFilipinoFinnishFrenchGalicianGermanGreekHaitian CreoleHebrewHindiHungarianIcelandicIndonesianIrishItalianJapaneseKoreanLatvianLithuanianMacedonianMalayMalteseNorwegianPersianPolishPortugueseRomanianRussianSerbianSlovakSlovenianSpanishSwahiliSwedishThaiTurkishUkrainianVietnameseWelshYiddish

Daily Mail

HAVE YOUR SAY |  READ ALL 27 COMMENTS

Jul 02, 2011 04:15 PM

27

>>> But if you are concerned about fellow Tamils you should also condemn LTTE.

The above words may sound neutral, in practical they are not so. Tamils who were living in the places other than TN, were very much vulnerable to lingual, racial discriminations, that had drafted many painful stories in the life of Tamils, upon all of those the poor Tamils remained as the kick bags, resisted the unbareables, their plea for peace and justice were not at all addressed by any of the governments, but still they don’t have enough courage  to respond violently because of the demographic reasons. From Sri Lanka, Malasiya and Myanmar in the international arena, Mumbai and Bangaluru within India. The only place at which the Tamils retreated with equal violence is Sri Lanka. That too by the LTTE, a group of victims, trained with dedication to form the worlds only organised and disceplined outfit fighting for freedom. So finding faults and accusing them without finding a proper solution for their peaceful existence is not fair at all.

Rajaguru K B

Madurai, India

PERMALINK | LIKE (1) | DISLIKE (0) | REPORT ABUSE

Jul 01, 2011 06:59 PM

26

>>> But I can’t view as yours, coz I have responsibility of protecting my fellow Tamils

If you are that concerend about protecting fellow Tamils, Were you not concerned when  LTTE was killing the very same fellow Tamilians in the last two decades? Were you not concerened with the reports that LTTE used your fellow tamilians as Human shield and shot them when they tried to escape in the last stages of the war.

I do support international inquiry and any one found guilty of war crimes should be punished. But if you are concerned about fellow Tamils you should also condemn LTTE

Suresh Kamath

Edison, United States

PERMALINK | LIKE (0) | DISLIKE (0) | REPORT ABUSE

Jul 01, 2011 06:09 PM

25

The SL govt. must be tried for war crimes.  What’s with the UN, US and the ICC?  Has no one any interest in the killing of Tamils?  Or is the SL government so powerful, that it gives a damn to all?

TD

Hyderabad, India

PERMALINK | LIKE (0) | DISLIKE (0) | REPORT ABUSE

Jul 01, 2011 12:42 PM

24

>>>But INA did not enslave Malaysian Tamils, nor were they Indian citizens.

Thanks friend, thanks for admitting, this is how entire India view this issue of Non Indian Tamils. But I can’t view as yours, coz I have responsibility of protecting my fellow Tamils. It is my birth responsibility to voice for their right, where ever they live. So called international boundaries are only 60 years old and my bondage with other Tamils, dates back to thousands of sorrowful years of declining Tamil existence.

It will eat much of the pages if I start furnishing the Indian and other countries ignorance on Tamils sufferings (both Indian and Non Indian). I brought INA to have have a comparision, secession coming out of state run oppression is more than a freedom from colonisation.

Rajaguru K B

Madurai, India

PERMALINK | LIKE (2) | DISLIKE (0) | REPORT ABUSE

Jul 01, 2011 12:30 AM

23

>>>> I would appreciate, if your stand was same with INA.

I am not sure why you are bringing INA into this. I never raised the topic of INA and before this I am sure you would not have known what my stand is Vis-a-Vis INA..

As far as I am concerned INA did not kill other Indian Moderates  like Gandhi, Nehru etc., even though Subhas Chanda Bose had difference of opinion with them.

He did not figt for secession  fom India. Rather he fought to get rid of the British who were ruling India. As far as Malaysain Tamils are concerned , If what you ae telling is true, I sympathize with them. But INA did not enslave Malaysian Tamils, nor were they Indian citizens. So I do not see the parallel that you are seeing.

last but not the least , I was not born at that time, so I cannot really know all the PROS and CONS of INA.  But I have been hearing and reading about LTTE since  the 1983 riots and have followed all the gory details of their killings. As far as I know INA did not indulge in such wanton killings. So my opinion is stll that LTTE is a terrorist outfit and INA is not

Suresh Kamath

Edison, United States

PERMALINK | LIKE (1) | DISLIKE (1) | REPORT ABUSE

READ ALL 27 COMMENTS

Post a Comment

You are not logged in, please log in or register

Comments Policy

We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism

But:

1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.

2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads

3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site

4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.

5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT

6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.

7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.

8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.

9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine — such as Google, Bing etc — caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:

a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com

b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com

c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments

d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you

10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:

http://blog.outlookindia.com/default.aspx?ddm=10&pid=1669&eid=5

You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT