uly 12, 2011 – 3:54 pm

Thank you, Uvindu.

We must not waste any time. Let us start with the education

in schools:

Education for war must be transformed into education for

peace:

Education for War

1. A compulsory programme(-Leadership Training -) at army

camps for university entrants introduced at short notice:

Friday Forum, 10 June 2011: ”…. The curriculum of the

training programme obtained by the Friday Forum after some effort reveals

extremely problematic aspects. No mention is made of the authority

responsible for the curriculum but a prominent photograph of the Defence

Secretary on the cover of the study guide suggests authorship by the Defence

establishment. …. What is more problematic is the content of the module on

history and national heritage. …. "National heritage" focuses exclusively

on prominent cultural symbols of the majority Sinhala community with none

from other communities. …. On the whole the curriculum seems to discourage

tolerance for viewpoint difference, and sensitivities for the pluralism and

diversity of our country. …. ”

One reason for this can be that the government want to show

the students that the military is very much a part of the governance in this

country and another reason can be that the students are warned from staging

protests.

2.

Why education matters for global security, Irina

Bokova(Director General, UNESCO) 1 March 2011: ” Education must rise on the

agenda of peace building. We know the wrong type of education can fuel

conflict. The use of education systems to foster hatred has contributed to

the underlying causes of conflicts, from Rwanda to Sri Lanka, but also in

Guatemala and Sudan.”

The Changing face of Wesak in Colombo and Militarizing Sri

Lanka, 15 May 2009:

A school honouring ex-soldiers in Vesak(the most important

Buddhist festival in Sri Lanka) with student dancers in combat dress

depicting guns and Vesak cards with roses on guns:

4.

Publication – The Sri Lankan Experience, Ariya Wickrema, National Consultant

Educational Publications Departmen and Peter Colenso, EducationSpecialist,

World Bank, Colombo, 2003:

”…. The Government dominates the educational publications

sector in Sri Lanka through its provision of free textbooks to all students

from grade 1 to 11 …. distortion of history …. the textbooks encourage

children to develop "apartheid attitudes" ….. Tamils are portrayed as

"aggressors"; forces of the Tamil kings are "mercenaries’ , whereas forces

of the Sinhala kings are "soldiers" …. War is shown as patriotic while

peace is portrayed as cowardice.”

5.The Two Faces of Education in Ethnic Conflict: Towards a

Peacebuilding Education for Children – Kenneth D Bush and Diana

Saltarelli(2000) – published by Innocenti Research Centre, UNICEF:

"Ethnic intolerance makes it appearance in the classroom in

many ways…… Textbooks have often been shown to contain negative ethnic

stereotypes….. A review of the textbooks used in the segregated schools of

Sri Lanka in the 1970s and 1980s, for example, found Sinhalese textbooks

scattered with images of Tamils as the historical enemies of the Sinhalese,

while celebrating ethnic heroes who had vanquished Tamils in ethnic wars.

Ignoring historical fact, these textbooks tended to portray Sinhalese

Buddhists as the only true Sri Lankans, with Tamils, Muslims and Christians

as non- indigenous and extraneous to Sri Lankan history. This version of

national history according to one commentator, has been deeply divisive in

the context of the wider state."

6. Reggie Siriwardene, a well-respected Sinhalese writer, in

a well-documented analysis of the effects of school textbooks on ethnic

relations in Sri Lanka(1984):

"Millions of school children are taught, in the name of

social studies, through text-books published by the state, the myths of

divergent racial origins which will help to divide the Sinhalese and Tamils

for more generations to come… What this lesson does is to evoke the

child’s memories of being frightened by his parents with threats of the

mysterious and fearful `billo’ to identify these bogeymen as Tamil agents,

and thus to enlist the deep-seated irrational fears of early childhood for

the purpose of creating apprehension and hatred of Tamils."

7. In the 1950s and 1960s Tamil and Sinhalese scholars

vehemently protested this but the Education Department that produces the

textbooks dismissed their concern. Education for Peace